FLCC> FW: crushing of local cyclist

Bill Goffe goffe at oswego.edu
Tue Oct 23 14:18:11 EDT 2007


On "claimed he didn't see" it might be a case of "inattentional
blindness." Clearly I wasn't there, but this is a fairly common phenomena
and I'd like to think that not everyone is that mendacious.
One writeup is http://www.visualexpert.com/Resources/inattentionalblindness.html .
The one about the airliner flying into the ground is apparently a classic example. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inattentional_blindness describes how people
missed a person in a gorilla suit in a film as they were looking for
something else.

It would appear that the take-home message for cyclists is to be extra
careful.

        - Bill

Alex said:

>    John, FLCC,
> 
>    It's probably just coincidence but the two times I was hit in the city
>    were by large Jeep SUVs. On the first occasion, the guy went right through
>    a red light and hit my car in the back, spinning me completely around
>    (claimed he didn't see the red, or any, light). On the second occasion, I
>    was hit while riding my bike to work by someone who turned into me trying
>    to get into a driveway (claimed he didn't see me).
> 
>    Yesterday, I saw an accident on Meadow street by the Ithaca bakery and,
>    you guessed it, a large Jeep SUV was involved.
> 
>    Ride safe,
>    Alex
> 
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: John Dennis <jvd at baka.com>
>    To: flcc at icycle.org; 'Mike Simkin' <mes13 at cornell.edu>
>    Sent: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 8:29 pm
>    Subject: FLCC> FW: crushing of local cyclist
> 
>    Hi Mike and the FLCC listserv,
> 
>    Yes, I was in error in my earlier post to have implied that the driver of
>    the Jeep was at fault, as there was little or nothing first IJ article to
>    warrant such an implication. From the IJ today we learn that witnesses saw
>    the FedeX truck driven into the path of a Jeep Grand Cherokee which had
>    right-of-way.
> 
>    My point about momentum is that many SUVs are unnecessarily heavy and thus
>    are more prone to cause harm to others when involved in accidents.  Why
>    not complain about this?
> 
>    According to Wikipedia, "vehicles over 6,000 pounds are restricted from
>    many [1]city roadways in the United States although there is some dispute
>    about whether this restriction is for actual curb weight or for GVWR
>    (gross vehicle weight rating). GVWR is the maximum allowable total
>    [2]weight of a [3]road [4]vehicle or trailer that is loaded, including the
>    weight of the vehicle itself plus [5]fuel, [6]passengers, [7]cargo, and
>    [8]trailer tongue weight." In the [9]United States, two important GVWR
>    limitations are 6,000 [10]pounds (2,721 [11]kg) and 8,500 pounds (3,856
>    kg).
> 
>    Andy Bowers suggests in a [12]2004 article that California has banned big
>    SUVs from many of its roads without realizing it. He claims that many big
>    SUVs are banned from most roads in LA, San Francisco and Santa Monica by
>    pre-SUV laws that banned trucks weighing more than 6000 pounds. Below I
>    have made a table showing the GRWR and curb weights for various 2007 model
>    SUVs and a few 2007 sedans. Note that the Jeep Grand Cherokee--the sedan
>    involved in Friday's accident--is just under the 6000 pound GRWR
>    threshold.
> 
> 
>  [13]NYS's limits on vehicle weights appear to be very liberal.  The weight on a single wheel "shall be not  more
> 
>    than eleven thousand two hundred pounds." That's the equivalent of an entire H1 Hummer resting on a single wheel.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    Vehicle weights in pounds
>    for 2007 vehicles unless
>    indicated
>                                                    factor
>                                                    GRWR is
>                                 GRWR   curb weight >6000 lbs
>    Hummer H1 (2006)             10,300        7847      1.72
>    Hummer H2                      8600        6400      1.43
>    Lincoln Navigator              7800        6008      1.30
>    Chevy Tahoe 2008               7300        5524      1.22
>    Chevy Suburban                 7200        5505      1.20
>    GMC Yukon                      7100        5635      1.18
>    Toyota Land Cruiser            6925        5425      1.15
>    Toyota Sequoia                 6600        5140      1.10
>    VW Touareg                     6493        5254      1.08
>    Jeep Grand Cherokee            5900        4488      0.98
>    Hummer H3                      5850        4700      0.98
> 
>    Toyota Rav4                    4535        3444      0.76
>    Toyota Camry                               3680
>    Toyota Corolla                             2550
>    Toyota Prius                               2890
>    VW Passat                                  3344
>    VW Beetle                                  2948
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    Does the Town or City of Ithaca have any weight limits?  Engineer Tom West
>    of the City of Ithaca told me today he didn't know of any, but he will
>    check. I have found a limitation of truck weights to 5 tons in parts of
>    [14]Forest Home.
> 
>    Would it be out-of-line for cyclists as a group to ask that the Town of
>    Ithaca and the City of Ithaca to impose limits on the size of SUVs allowed
>    on Ithaca streets?  I think not.  For one thing, it would be a show of
>    solidarity with the cyclist, Edward Coil, who was crushed by the Fedex
>    truck as a result of Friday's accident. Second, are streets would be safer
>    for everyone, no just cyclists.  Third, our pavements would last longer
>    and there would be less pressure to raise taxes. And fourth, our City and
>    Town would be on record as taking a stand to say, Enough is enough from a
>    sustainable livelihoods perspective.  In this age of global warming that
>    may yet have catastrophic impacts on many millions of people, there is no
>    need to drive to work or to the store or anywhere in a vehicle that weighs
>    over 6000 pounds. Could a ban be imposed on a given street, when a (12,000
>    lb?) snow plow was allowed to operate on that street. I have no idea!  The
>    latter is an emergency vehicle and the objective of minimizing weight
>    stresses to pavement and the number of heavy vehicles on our streets would
>    still be served.
> 
>    Friday's accident is at least the second fatal SUV-related accident in
>    Ithaca in the past year, is it not?  In an earlier accident on Seneca St.,
>    a female pedestrian was fatally run over by an SUV as she crossed the
>    street. The driver of the SUV continued on without stopping.  Police later
>    found him shopping at Home Depot and he apparently denied knowing that he
>    had run over anything.  According to the IJ on-line comment section, the
>    driver received only a traffic citation.
> 
>    One wonders if members of the community spoke up and asked the police and
>    District Attorney's Office how much investigation went into the driver's
>    claim to have been completely unaware of having hit anything? Was this
>    driver asked to submit to a polygraph or related test?  Did the District
>    Attorney's office order simulation tests to be performed to test whether
>    it would be physically possible for an SUV of the model in question to hit
>    a manikin of the victim's weight, size, and density without the impact
>    shock being clearly noticeable to a driver?
> 
>    If California's major cities already have 6000 pound weight limits for
>    most of their roads, why shouldn't Ithaca pass similar laws?  In our case,
>    however, I would be in favor of there being a clear intent to enforce
>    these laws for both SUVs and commercial trucks (with exceptions for fire
>    trucks, snow plows, garbage trucks and similar service vehicles).
> 
>    Best,   John
>    No virus found in this outgoing message.
>    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>    Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.5/1085 - Release Date:
>    10/22/2007 10:35 AM
>    No virus found in this outgoing message.
>    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>    Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.5/1085 - Release Date:
>    10/22/2007 10:35 AM
> 
>  _______________________________________________
>  FLCC mailing list
>  [15]FLCC at icycle.org
>  [16]http://icycle.org/mailman/listinfo/flcc_icycle.org
> 
>    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>    Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free [17]AOL Mail!
> 
> References
> 
>    Visible links
>    1. City
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City
>    2. Weight
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight
>    3. Road
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road
>    4. Vehicle
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle
>    5. Fuel
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel
>    6. Passenger
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger
>    7. Cargo
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo
>    8. Trailer
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trailer
>    9. United States
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States
>   10. Pound (mass)
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_%28mass%29
>   11. Kilogram
> 	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilogram
>   12. http://slate.com/id/2104755/
>   13. http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/menugetf.cgi?COMMONQUERY=LAWS
>   14. http://fhia.org/events/truckcount.htm
>   15. mailto:FLCC at icycle.org
>   16. http://icycle.org/mailman/listinfo/flcc_icycle.org
>   17. http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/index.htm?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000970

> _______________________________________________
> FLCC mailing list
> FLCC at icycle.org
> http://icycle.org/mailman/listinfo/flcc_icycle.org


-- 
         *------------------------------------------------------*
         | Bill Goffe                 goffe at oswego.edu          |
         | Department of Economics    voice: (315) 312-3444     |
         | SUNY Oswego                fax:   (315) 312-5444     |
         | 416 Mahar Hall             http://cook.rfe.org       |          
         | Oswego, NY  13126                                    |
*--------*------------------------------------------------------*-----------*
| "Retreat? Hell, we just got here."                                        |
|   -- Captain Lloyd William, U.S. Marine Corps, on the suggestion of       |
|      retreating French soldiers that his Marines retreat as well at the   |
|      Battle of Belleau Wood on June 4, 1918. "The First World War," John  |
|      Keegan, p. 407.                                                      |
*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*




More information about the FLCC mailing list