FLCC> crank length question
Rob
rob at cginy.net
Tue Apr 22 20:43:52 EDT 2008
Crank length is mostly a function of personal preference, torque per
rev gained/lost with adding/subtracting crank length is negligible. I
would suggest you use what you've always used if it's available in the
compact diameter.
--------------------------------------
Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero
-Horace
On Apr 22, 2008, at 20:35, jlicht61 at aol.com wrote:
> I am thinking of putting a compact on my old steel road bike to gain
> some lower gears. What if anything should I have to consider in
> regards to crank length. I've been riding a 170 just because its
> what the bike came with back then. I usually see 170, 172.5, and
> 175 mm offered. I realize that without changing anything else the
> crank length affects leverage, but how much is 2.5 -5mm going to
> matter to me.
>
> Thanks ahead of time.
>
> Jerry Licht
> Get the MapQuest Toolbar, Maps, Traffic, Directions & More!
> _______________________________________________
> FLCC mailing list
> FLCC at icycle.org
> http://icycle.org/mailman/listinfo/flcc_icycle.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://icycle.org/pipermail/flcc_icycle.org/attachments/20080422/f39ce3b0/attachment.html
More information about the FLCC
mailing list