FLCC> Is the NY State Senate nuts?
Andrejs Ozolins
andrejs at ozolins.com
Thu May 8 12:26:24 EDT 2008
rob at cginy.net wrote:
>>> This is the main reason imho why the tax reduction is madness. Gas taxes
>>> should be *increased* to address the true issues.
>>>
>
> I don't necessarily agree. That's a rather short-sighted solution
Well, first off, I don't mean it as a solution, much less long-term. I
only mean that increased cost of gas, once it gets high enough, will in
fact probably result in less gas used. I.e., the issue was whether
"market forces" would do any good in this very limited case, defined in
absurdly simple-minded terms.
But neither do I agree with your analysis. Sure, it will hit everyone,
including the poor, everywhere they pay for anything -- since
transportation costs are part of everything we buy. But, even there,
high enough costs of fuel would eventually result in a rationalization
of the distribution system -- producing stuff locally, promoting
seasonally, reviving cheaper transport systems like marine and rail,
etc. etc. Again, in the end, a saner use of resources could result,
having screwed the poor in the process -- so what else is new?
I think it's stupid to rely on the cost of fuel to effect these changes;
they should be pursued by carefully considered social policy. But, how
we get to enjoy a govt capable of enlightened policies is an entirely
different question.
Andrejs
More information about the FLCC
mailing list